Design WHO-aligned
KAP Assessments
3 dimensions. 11-section workflow. Deterministic item-quality checker. Built on WHO STEPS, COSMIN, AMEE Guide 87, and Tourangeau's 4-stage model.
KAP dimensions — Knowledge · Attitude · Practice
workflow sections — topic to fielding-ready tool
standards integrated · WHO STEPS, COSMIN, AMEE 87
starts here · 7-day money back
How KAPMinds works
The 11-section workflow
Each section is its own AI-assisted accordion. Outputs flow forward — your KAP framework informs blueprints; blueprints inform item generation; everything assembles into a WHO-aligned synopsis.
Health Topic & Context
Inputs
AI action
Output
Health issue scoped, target population confirmed, KAP-scope rationale.
KAP Framework (K→A→P chain)
Inputs
AI action
Output
K→A→P causal chain with barriers, enablers, and target behaviour mapped.
Research Question & FINER
Inputs
AI action
Output
3 question drafts + FINER score (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant).
Theory & Framework
Inputs
AI action
Output
3 theory candidates (HBM, TPB, COM-B…) with citations + conceptual framework.
Knowledge Blueprint
Inputs
AI action
Output
Knowledge domains, true/false vs MCQ item-types, correct-answer criteria.
Attitude Blueprint
Inputs
AI action
Output
Attitude dimensions (valence/strength), Likert anchors, reverse-scored items plan.
Practice Blueprint
Inputs
AI action
Output
Target behaviours, frequency/recency anchors, observable indicators.
Item Generation (K + A + P)
Inputs
AI action
Output
AI-drafted K, A, P items aligned to blueprints — deterministic checker validates each.
Quality Audit
Inputs
AI action
Output
Cultural sensitivity, literacy grade, WHO alignment, social-desirability flags.
Scoring & Admin Plan
Inputs
AI action
Output
K/A/P scoring keys, KAP-gap index formula, admin mode, translation guidance.
Synopsis Generation
Inputs
AI action
Output
WHO-aligned KAP protocol exportable as DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
Three dimensions
K · A · P — every item-type covered
From true/false knowledge items to Likert attitude scales to frequency-anchored practice questions. Each dimension gets its own blueprint, item-type taxonomy, and scoring logic.
Knowledge
What respondents know — declarative & applied.
True / False
Quick factual screen with chance-correction.
Single-best MCQ
One correct of 4–5 options, distractors plausible.
Multi-select MCQ
All-that-apply with partial-credit option.
Scenario-based
Vignette-driven applied-knowledge probe.
Fill-in-the-blank
Open-response with rubric-scored keys.
Don’t-know option
Explicit DK to suppress guessing bias.
Attitude
What respondents feel — valence, strength, ambivalence.
Likert (5-point)
Strongly disagree → strongly agree, classic.
Likert (7-point)
Finer gradation for high-stakes constructs.
Semantic differential
Bipolar adjective scale (e.g. safe–unsafe).
Reverse-scored
Acquiescence-bias safeguard.
Visual analogue
0–100 slider for continuous judgement.
Bogardus social-distance
Stigma and acceptability gradient.
Practice
What respondents do — observable, time-bounded.
Frequency (anchored)
Never · rarely · sometimes · often · always.
Recency (last-N days)
Bounded recall window cuts memory bias.
Yes / No behaviour
Binary screen for discrete actions.
Skill self-rating
Behavioural-capability anchor (COM-B).
Time-use diary
Duration-based self-report with anchors.
Observed-proxy
Indirect indicator when self-report is biased.
Compliance
Built on the standards
your reviewers expect
Every item is checked against applicable standards in real time before fielding.
Why this matters
AI drafts items,
a checker catches the rest
Other tools
Give you items. That's it.
When the AI invents double-barreled questions, leading wording, technical jargon above your literacy target, or response-bias triggers — you won't notice until your pilot data is unusable or the ethics committee flags it.
KAPMinds
AI generates. Checker validates.
A deterministic checker re-reads every item for double-barreled stems, leading wording, social-desirability cues, Flesch-Kincaid grade above target, and acquiescence patterns. Fails are flagged with the exact rule violated.
- Deterministic, not stochastic — same item, same verdict.
- WHO STEPS, COSMIN, and AMEE Guide 87 rules built in.
- Each fail returns a specific rewrite suggestion.
AI-drafted items
24
8 K · 8 A · 8 P · Likert-5 anchors
Checker flagged
3
2 double-barreled · 1 leading
Pass rate
87.5%
21 / 24 cleared — rewrites suggested
Plans
Simple pricing
Access 1m
15,000 Mindful AI Tokens
- All 3 KAP dimensions
- 11-section workflow
- WHO-aligned synopsis exports
Access 2m
15,000 Mindful AI Tokens / month
- Everything in 1m
- Priority AI throughput
- Save ₹99 vs monthly
Access 3m
15,000 Mindful AI Tokens / month
- Everything in 2m
- Quarterly study cadence
- Save ₹198 vs monthly
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Common questions from public-health researchers, supervisors, and IEC reviewers.
Is KAPMinds validated for South Asian populations?
The item-quality checker includes literacy targets (Flesch-Kincaid grade 6–8 default) and cultural-adaptation prompts suited to South Asian survey contexts. Final localisation and back-translation review by domain experts remain your responsibility before fielding.
Can I import a draft questionnaire I already have?
Yes. Paste your draft KAP items and the tool maps them to the K / A / P blueprint, audits each against COSMIN and AMEE Guide 87 criteria, and flags double-barreled or leading items with rewrite suggestions.
Does it support translation and multi-language fielding?
Synopsis output includes translation-mode guidance (forward-back translation, expert panel review, cognitive interviewing). Item-level translation is not auto-generated — it requires a qualified bilingual reviewer; the workflow documents the steps your ethics committee will expect.
What pilot sample size do you recommend?
Section 10 (Admin & Pilot Plan) generates a pilot N based on item count, response-scale type, and reliability target (Cronbach's alpha 0.70 by default). Typical pilots range from 30 to 100 respondents per dimension; the tool justifies the number against COSMIN guidance.
Will my ethics committee accept the KAP protocol?
Output follows WHO STEPS survey methodology and CHERRIES web-survey reporting standards. Indian and international ethics committees recognise this format. Every section is editable before export — you retain full control.
How does the quality audit catch bad items?
Deterministic checks scan each item for double-barreled wording, leading phrasing, jargon above your literacy target, social-desirability triggers, acquiescence patterns, and missing don't-know options. Each fail returns the rule violated plus a suggested rewrite.
Can I scope to just K+A or A+P (not all three)?
Yes. The KAP Framework step lets you scope to any 2-of-3 or all-3 dimensions. Blueprint, item-generation, and scoring steps adjust accordingly — KAP-gap index is recomputed for whichever dimensions you include.
What if I run out of Mindful Tokens mid-month?
Top up any time with Boost (₹149), Lab (₹349), or Project (₹699) packs. Top-up tokens never expire while you remain subscribed.
What export formats are supported?
DOCX, PDF, and Markdown. Exports include scoring keys, admin guidance, item-level rationale, and WHO-aligned methodology summary — ready for ethics-committee submission.
Can I cancel anytime?
Yes — cancel from Settings. Access continues to the end of the paid period. 7-day money-back on any plan. No questions asked, no retention calls.
Design your KAP study in 5 minutes.
1 free AI call. No credit card. Sign in with Google.